Indian LCCs Take Price War to Overseas Routes

[JuliusWong 0]

Indian full service airlines, buffeted by high fuel costs and intense competition, face new headwinds on their lucrative international routes as budget carriers launch services with rock-bottom fares.

 

With low-cost carriers launching routes using narrow-body aircraft to overseas destinations within five hours flying time of India, full-service players are being forced to respond with similar no-frills offerings on popular and profitable routes.

 

Budget airline IndiGo, which in June firmed up a USD$16.2 billion order for 180 single-aisle Airbus aircraft, has received government approval to fly to Singapore, Bangkok, Dubai and Muscat, and is luring passengers with round-trip fares as low as INR9,999 rupees (USD$220).

 

By comparison, full service carriers charge between INR17,000 and INR22,000 rupees for economy class Mumbai-Singapore routes booked a month in advance.

 

"The entry of IndiGo will help in growing the market. Low cost carriers are creating a new market with a new breed of customers who did not fly international earlier," said Kapil Kaul, chief executive for the Indian subcontinent and Middle East at the Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation (CAPA).

 

Source: http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1314620293.html

[jackch747 0]

Interesting. This makes me wonder why hasn't AK fly to Dubai? and why did they choose Abu Dhabi instead of Dubai?

[rickn 0]

Did you mean D7 flying to Dubai? Abu Dhabi also far cheaper and not far from Dubai.

Interesting. This makes me wonder why hasn't AK fly to Dubai? and why did they choose Abu Dhabi instead of Dubai?

[alberttky 0]

IndiGo is aiming to quickly expand its new operation at Singapore and tap into fast-growing demand at the lower end of the Singapore-India market. IndiGo expects to be serving Singapore’s Changi Airport with six daily flights by early next year, which would make it the largest Indian carrier and the second largest carrier overall in the Singapore-India market after Singapore Airlines. The Indian low-cost carrier launched flights to Singapore last week with a single daily A320 frequency from its main base at Delhi.

 

IndiGo has already set a 15-Oct-2011 launch date for a daily flight from Mumbai to Singapore and is now eyeing several other potential routes to Singapore as part of an ambitious expansion plan for its new international operation.

 

IndiGo expects to serve Singapore from Chennai and Kolkata

 

IndiGo president Aditya Ghosh told CAPA at last week’s launch event in Singapore that the carrier plans to add services to Singapore from Chennai and Kolkata within the next few months. Services from other Indian cities including Bangalore and Hyderabad are also under consideration but the initial priority will be Chennai and Kolkata. Mr Ghosh also says additional capacity on the Delhi-Singapore and Mumbai-Singapore sectors is envisioned by early next year as he believes both routes can support at least two daily flights.

 

Mr Ghosh is bullish on the Singapore market as IndiGo is the first LCC to connect Singapore with the two main Indian metros of Delhi or Mumbai. Both routes are already relatively underserved given the economic and ethnic ties between the two countries. IndiGo’s lower fares are also expected to stimulate significantly more demand on both routes.

 

Prior to last week Singapore-Delhi was only served by three full-service carriers – Air India, Singapore Airlines and Jet Airways. Singapore-Mumbai is now served by the same three carriers as well as two other full-service carriers, Kingfisher Airlines and Qantas.

 

The Singapore-Chennai market has significantly more competition as it is already served by six carriers including two LCCs – Tiger Airways and Air India Express. But Mr Ghosh says there is huge demand between Singapore and Chennai because a large portion of Singapore’s ethnic Indian population hails from the Chennai area. He also believes IndiGo offers a different experience than Singapore-based Tiger, which now offers two daily A320 flights to Chennai, and will not have any trouble competing against the LCCs already serving the Singapore-Chennai market.

 

Air India Express currently operates one daily B737-800 flight between Singapore and Chennai while its full-service parent, Air India, offers two daily A321 flights on the route. Jet Airways also operates a daily B737-800 flight between Singapore and Chennai. The Singapore Airlines (SIA) Group offers 13 weekly frequencies, including a daily B777-200 flight operated by SIA and six weekly frequencies operated by regional airline subsidiary SilkAir with A320 family aircraft, giving the SIA Group the most total capacity on the route.

 

Singapore-Kolkata is a smaller market but also has significant low-end demand, particularly from the Indian expatriate worker sector. The route currently is served by only one LCC, Air India Express, but was previously served by Jetstar Asia. Mr Ghosh believes IndiGo can make the route work as IndiGo is already the largest carrier at Kolkata. Air India Express currently only has three weekly frequencies between Singapore-Kolkata as the route is dominated by the SIA Group, which has daily flights with four of the weekly frequencies operated by SilkAir and three by SIA.

 

Chennai is currently the largest Indian route from Singapore

 

Singapore-Chennai is currently the largest route between Singapore and India based on current capacity data from Innovata. It is also India’s eighth largest international route and the second largest international route at Chennai, only slightly behind Colombo based on seats per week. Singapore-Mumbai is currently the second largest Singapore-India route, followed by Singapore-Delhi, Singapore-Tiruchirappalli, Singapore-Bangalore and Singapore-Kolkata.

 

Singapore-Mumbai, however, will overtake Singapore-Chennai by the end of October as the largest Singapore-India route. In addition to IndiGo launching services on the route in mid-October, Singapore Airlines is adding three frequencies (for a total of 17) from the start of the Northern Hemisphere winter schedule at the end of October. But Singapore-Chennai could re-emerge as the largest route between Singapore and India early next year if IndiGo follows through on its plans to begin operating the route.

 

In total there are now just over 38,000 seats per week in each direction between Singapore and India. This will increase to over 41,000 seats by early November and over 42,000 by early January as several carriers add capacity between the two countries. Other capacity increases taking effect from the end of October include Tiger Airways resuming Singapore-Bengalaru service with four weekly flights, Jet Airways up-gauging its daily Singapore-Delhi flight from B737-800s to A330-200s (Jet’s Singapore-Mumbai flight is already operated with A330s) and SIA adding a third weekly frequency to Ahmedabad.

 

The Changi Airport Group is bullish on even more growth on Indian routes. Changi says Singapore-India traffic surged 14% last year to 2.55 million passengers and grew another 7% through the first seven months of 2011.

 

Changi is now trying to woo SpiceJet, another Indian LCC which is looking at expanding into Southeast Asia. Qantas, which already operates three weekly A330 flights from Singapore to Mumbai, is also now looking at using its potential new Asian premium carrier to serve the Singapore-India market.

 

While Changi now has services from 11 Indian cities, in terms of total seats India is only Changi’s seventh largest market (behind Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, Thailand, China and Hong Kong), which shows there is a lot more room for potential growth.

 

Currently there is not a single India route among Singapore's 20 largest routes by capacity (seats). But of India’s 20 largest international routes, three are now to Singapore (Chennai, Mumbai and Delhi, all of which fall within the top 15).

 

IndiGo believes it is well positioned to tap into the expected growth in Singapore-India traffic given its low fares, which are particularly attractive to ethnic traffic, and its strong position in the Indian market. IndiGo also hopes to take advantage of the fact that in the Singapore-India bilateral there is currently more unused capacity on the Indian side.

Plenty of space for expansion by Indian carriers in Singapore-India bilateral

 

IndiGo tells CAPA that while Singaporean carriers are fully utilising or nearly fully utilising the capacity available to each side in the bilateral, there is still plenty of room for growth for Indian carriers. The cap is based on total seats per week and is applied to the entire market with no route specific limitations.

 

Innovata data shows Singaporean carriers currently account for 62% of total capacity between Singapore and India while Indian carriers account for 36% (Qantas accounts for the remaining 2%). The SIA Group, including SilkAir, now accounts for nearly half of all capacity in the Singapore-India market.

 

As a result, there is room for Indian carriers to add at least several thousand seats each way before approaching the current capacity cap. IndiGo’s potential six flights – two from Delhi, two from Mumbai and one each from Chennai and Kolkata – would provide a total of 7560 one-way seats from Singapore to India. Such an operation would give IndiGo about a 16% share of the market, making it the largest Indian carrier in Singapore.

 

IndiGo would also become the fourth largest low-cost carrier or group at Changi after the AirAsia, Jetstar and Tiger groups. Cebu Pacific is currently the fourth largest LCC player at Changi.

 

The ambitious plan for Singapore comes as IndiGo rapidly builds up its new international operation, which it launched at the beginning of this month after reaching its 5th birthday. Indian regulations limit new carriers to domestic routes for the first five years.

 

Mr Ghosh told CAPA that IndiGo will remain largely a domestic carrier but will allocate a large portion of its additional capacity to the international market if it sees opportunities on international routes. He said within three years 30 to 40 of IndiGo’s A320s could be allocated to international routes.

 

CAPA previously reported that IndiGo plans to have 10 A320s and 15% of its total capacity allocated to international routes by Mar-2012. See related article: IndiGo launches international services, targets 15% of seats in this segment by Mar-2012.

 

IndiGo last week took delivery of its 44th A320 and according to Ascend data has 231 additional A320s or A320neos on order. Mr Ghosh says IndiGo’s massive order book ensures fleet growth of one aircraft per month for the next 14 years. All of the carrier’s A320s have 180 seats in an all-economy configuration.

 

Indigo expects to have seven or eight international gateways in India

 

Mr Ghosh told CAPA last week that he expects IndiGo will eventually operate international services from seven or eight Indian cities. In addition to Bengalaru, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Mumbai and Kolkata, IndiGo is also looking at launching international flights from the southern state of Kerala. However, Kerala will likely only be connected to destinations in the Middle East, particularly Dubai, rather than Southeast Asia.

 

In addition to Singapore, IndiGo has already launched international flights to Bangkok and Dubai. Mr Ghosh says flights to Muscat in Oman and Kathmandu in Nepal will be launched next month. Muscat will be served from Mumbai while Kathmandu will initially be served from Delhi. Dubai is already served from both Delhi and Mumbai with routes to other Indian cities expected to be launched over the next few months.

 

IndiGo has previously said it is looking at serving about six cities in the Middle East. Mr Ghosh told CAPA last week that after Dubai and Muscat the priority would be Jeddah in Saudi Arabia. He says IndiGo is now seeking authority to serve Jeddah and is “hoping sometime this winter” to launch the service.

 

At Bangkok, IndiGo only has services from Delhi but is launching services from Mumbai early next month. Mr Ghosh says IndiGo also aims to start within the next few months serving Bangkok from Kolkata but says Chennai will likely only be linked with Singapore.

 

He says Kuala Lumpur is not being considered initially but may be added to the international network as part of a later phase. Mr Ghosh says IndiGo prefers to focus for now on high density operations to a smaller number of Southeast Asian destinations.

 

http://www.centreforaviation.com/analysis/singapore-india-market-poised-for-rapid-growth-as-indigo-eyes-large-operation-at-changi-59154

[Izanee 0]

WTF - i really don't know why KUL is so underserved from india. Lots of indian pax transfer on to SQ/MI's SIN-KUL service!

[BC Tam 2]

An illustration of how success beget further success I suppose

 

Of academic interest only nowadays, wonder how KUL might have fared if gahmen's aviation services policies of days gone by had not been as protectionist as they were, dare we even imagine them to have been as liberal (or even more so) as those of our northern and southern neighbours ?

[Johan Z 0]

WTF - i really don't know why KUL is so underserved from india. Lots of indian pax transfer on to SQ/MI's SIN-KUL service!

 

Most of the Indian airlines use narrowbody to Malaysia, while MH and AK use widebody to India.

[Raj 0]

Most of the Indian airlines use narrowbody to Malaysia, while MH and AK use widebody to India.

 

Yes that is true but quite alot of them also use narrowbody's to SIN. You do get the A330's and B777 from the Indian carriers but a majority is still flown on narrowbody but as i've said last time KUL is so underserved from India vs SIN. Its amazing the amount of Indian Carriers that fly into SIN. Its a shame we can't be on PAR with sin.

[alberttky 0]

Its a shame we can't be on PAR with sin.

 

We have politicians with mindsets that are not on PAR with SIN.

[Sandeep G 1]

We have politicians with mindsets that are not on PAR with SIN.

 

Are you sure?

[alberttky 0]

Are you sure?

 

You think otherwise?

[Sandeep G 1]

You think otherwise?

Apologies: OFF TOPIC.

 

I think that was inherent in my first reply to you. Each country has its pros and cons. I don't trust politicians ANYWHERE and I've lived in three countries so far. Whilst the pros for Singapore may outweigh those of Malaysia - with respect to politicians being of higher calibre down south - well, its a subjective argument - but I don't think so. The fact is, there are qualified persons in parliament - some with vision and a sense of duty - but there are many that are just seat warmers, and come out with rip-snorters that inflame the public. The political landscape in Singapore is not as different from that of Malaysia.

 

Politicians down south are more board members of a corporation and citizens are the employees of said corporation. The recent election here goes to show you what Singaporeans themselves think of their long-serving politicians. The future of both countries is set to be interesting with some sense of reform taking place in both.

 

Don't just judge a book by its cover. If you haven't already - come down here, live here as you would live in Malaysia and realises the pros and cons for yourself.

 

BACK TO TOPIC:

Well, looks like Scoot will be trying to make in-roads into India. Understand that Hyderabad/Amritsar/Ahmedabad and possibly even Chennai/Mumbai/Delhi are on the radar. Whilst there may be many Indian carriers operating wide-bodies into SIN - the fact is, I often here them departing with less than 100 POB. So IndiGo's plans with the A320 seem more realistic.

[alberttky 0]

If you haven't already - come down here, live here as you would live in Malaysia and realises the pros and cons for yourself.

 

 

FYI... I am based in SIN. Yes while I agree they're not perfect, they are still better than those up north. Just my opinion.

[Robert 0]

FYI... I am based in SIN. Yes while I agree they're not perfect, they are still better than those up north. Just my opinion.

 

As a Brit who has worked in both locations and currently commutes back to KL every week I belive I have a failrly good view of the pro's and cons.

 

Gnerally the overall pro's of living in SG far outweigh those of Malaysia. I dont trust any government but the one in SG is one of the better run and doesnt flip flop over policy all the time and tries to look at the bigger picture.

 

I read many times about why doesnt this airline fly to KL or why doesnt MAS increase its schedule when SQ flies twice a day to some locations.

 

Ask yourself what is the govenment doing to attract foreign investment and improve infrastrure?

 

Why is it that banks like to put their regional HQ in SG when the costs are so much higher than Malaysia. SG is now an economic powerhouse in the region but where is Malaysia?

 

Lets look at aviation, Changi is great but of couurse not perfect. KLIA looks nice but is poorly designed IMHO and is now a political toy. SG is forward thinking when it comes to open skies policies where as MY stunts growth because it needs to protect the poorly run flag carrier.

 

 

More high end foreign investment in MY could mean more premium class seats being sold on flights which in turn could generate more flights.

 

The list could go on and on……

 

Now please don't think I dislike Malaysia because I don't and infact I'm very fond of it as well as it being my 2nd home location.

Edited September 22, 2011 by Robert

[dean hizudy 0]

As a Brit who has worked in both locations and currently commutes back to KL every week I belive I have a failrly good view of the pro's and cons.

 

Gnerally the overall pro's of living in SG far outweigh those of Malaysia. I dont trust any government but the one in SG is one of the better run and doesnt flip flop over policy all the time and tries to look at the bigger picture.

 

I read many times about why doesnt this airline fly to KL or why doesnt MAS increase its schedule when SQ flies twice a day to some locations.

 

Ask yourself what is the govenment doing to attract foreign investment and improve infrastrure?

 

Why is it that banks like to put their regional HQ in SG when the costs are so much higher than Malaysia. SG is now an economic powerhouse in the region but where is Malaysia?

 

Lets look at aviation, Changi is great but of couurse not perfect. KLIA looks nice but is poorly designed IMHO and is now a political toy. SG is forward thinking when it comes to open skies policies where as MY stunts growth because it needs to protect the poorly run flag carrier.

 

 

More high end foreign investment in MY could mean more premium class seats being sold on flights which in turn could generate more flights.

 

The list could go on and on……

 

Now please don't think I dislike Malaysia because I don't and infact I'm very fond of it as well as it being my 2nd home location.

singapore is an advance country while malaysia is still considered as a developing country. we cannot compare 2 countries not in the same league.

[Ja Singh 2]

singapore is an advance country while malaysia is still considered as a developing country. we cannot compare 2 countries not in the same league.

Why dont compare? they both started at the same time. Same location. Like it or not its the governerce.that's why not in same league.Dont find excuses.

Now that u understand,still not too late,what are you going to do about it?

 

On another matter we should all be proud of what air asia hs done for malaysia.not have ill feelings about it for personal reasons.

Edited September 22, 2011 by jadivindra

[Waiping 12]

During the pre-WWII era there were 2 important port of call for the traders thanks to the development by the British - Penang & Singapore. Malaya achieved independence in 1957 and Singapore, along with Sabah & Sarawak joined Malaysia in 1963. Singapore was then separated in 1965. Logically Singapore is way younger by 9 years to Malaysia.

 

According to Wikipedia:-

 

AREA - SIN (694 KM2/268 Sq Miles) vs MAS (330,000 KM2/127,000 Sq Miles)

POPULATION - 5M vs 28M

 

Malaysia is blessed with plenty of natural resources including water catchment area and Singapore has none.

 

However, the most important thing is it's RM2.50 to SGD1!

[dean hizudy 0]

Why dont compare? they both started at the same time. Same location. Like it or not its the governerce.that's why not in same league.Dont find excuses.

Now that u understand,still not too late,what are you going to do about it?

 

On another matter we should all be proud of what air asia hs done for malaysia.not have ill feelings about it for personal reasons.

then,can u compare US and mexico? they are neighboring countries also =P

[KK Lee 5]

then,can u compare US and mexico? they are neighboring countries also =P

 

Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas were part of Mexico previously. The difference today between Mexico and USA is largely resulted of different Government.

[Kee Hooi Yen 0]

My worry is Malaysia may not even comparable to other ASEAN countries (eg Indonesia, Vietnam etc) in the near future, let alone Singapore, economic wise

[Robert 0]

My worry is Malaysia may not even comparable to other ASEAN countries (eg Indonesia, Vietnam etc) in the near future, let alone Singapore, economic wise

 

 

Im not so sure about that but Malaysia is not advancing as quick as it should and the leadership must take the blame.

[BC Tam 2]

..... the leadership must take the blame.

Don't hold your breath

[filipeseda 0]

..... the leadership must take the blame.

 

 

Let us not forget that at the end of the day, the visions of both countries are the same, i.e. to achieve a developed status (don't need the details on that). Singapore has achieved that where as Malaysia has not, though it is inching towards and has made much progress since 57'. Personally, I believe Malaysia simply suffers from incompetent leadership and a political and economic system that desperately needs to be relieved of its corruption, cronies and datuks. Malaysia can prosper. On paper, if we were to take bets 30 years ago, I'm sure many would've thought otherwise.

 

As a Brit who has worked in both locations and currently commutes back to KL every week I belive I have a failrly good view of the pro's and cons.

 

Gnerally the overall pro's of living in SG far outweigh those of Malaysia. I dont trust any government but the one in SG is one of the better run and doesnt flip flop over policy all the time and tries to look at the bigger picture.

 

I read many times about why doesnt this airline fly to KL or why doesnt MAS increase its schedule when SQ flies twice a day to some locations.

 

Ask yourself what is the govenment doing to attract foreign investment and improve infrastrure?

 

Why is it that banks like to put their regional HQ in SG when the costs are so much higher than Malaysia. SG is now an economic powerhouse in the region but where is Malaysia?

 

Lets look at aviation, Changi is great but of couurse not perfect. KLIA looks nice but is poorly designed IMHO and is now a political toy. SG is forward thinking when it comes to open skies policies where as MY stunts growth because it needs to protect the poorly run flag carrier.

 

 

More high end foreign investment in MY could mean more premium class seats being sold on flights which in turn could generate more flights.

 

The list could go on and on……

 

Now please don't think I dislike Malaysia because I don't and infact I'm very fond of it as well as it being my 2nd home location.

 

You have a point there.