E Faizal 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2006 Cukai Pendaratan Lapangan Terbang Hari ni belajar sikit pasal bayaran yang dikenakan keatas setiap pesawat yang mendarat di lapangan terbang. Antaranya adalah landing fee. Masih lagi mencari jumlah yang MAS perlu bayar kepada Heatrow Airport bagi 3 pesawat 747 nya setiap hari. ************************************************************* Sumber : http://www.atac.ca/en/ourissues/advocacy/landing_fees.html Airport Landing Fees Costs to land For the second consecutive year, Toronto's Pearson International Airport has ranked second in an annual survey of the highest landing fees at Global Airports.[2] As Canada's main aviation hub, Toronto Pearson the most important lynchpin in the Canadian transportation industry. And a key component of the entire economy. Government rents, taxes and other cost pressures represent a significant portion of the airport's landing fees. Unless and until the Government of Canada reverses its punitive rent policy, Toronto Pearson and its customers and passengers will never be able to compete on the world stage for more and better flight options. With recent reforms to Tokyo Narita Airport's pricing methodology Toronto Pearson airport is at risk of becoming the most expensive airport in the world, a function of the rent payments due to the federal government. Pearson charged $8,203 (U.S.) for a Boeing 747-400 to land in 2004, compared with Tokyo Narita's $8,777 fee, according to the Air Transport Research Society's survey of 116 airports. In 2003, when the survey included 102 airports, Pearson had a $7,965 landing fee, second to Narita's $8,216 charge.[3] In 2004 Boeing 747-400 landing fees at other Canadian airports were sharply lower than at Pearson: Ottawa ($2,395), Montreal ($2,238), Halifax ($2,217), Vancouver ($2,146), Calgary ($2,033) and Edmonton ($1,872).[4] Pearson also had the second-most expensive landing fees in 2004 in the two other aircraft categories surveyed, charging $1,715 for an Airbus 321-100 and $497 for a CRJ200-LR.[5] Ranking of highest airport landing fees in 2004 Airport Landing fee ($U.S., 747-400) 1 Tokyo Narita $8,777 2 Toronto Pearson 8,203 3 Osaka Kansai 7,643 4 Birmingham, England 7,035 5 Warsaw Chopin 5,954 6 New York LaGuardia 5,731 7 Oslo 5,510 8 Shanghai Hongqiao 5,465 8 Shanghai Pudong 5,465 8 Beijing Capital 5,465 8 Guangzhou Bui Yun 5,465 12 Vienna 5,463 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Azrin A 2 Report post Posted June 23, 2006 Cukai Pendaratan Lapangan Terbang Hari ni belajar sikit pasal bayaran yang dikenakan keatas setiap pesawat yang mendarat di lapangan terbang. Antaranya adalah landing fee. Masih lagi mencari jumlah yang MAS perlu bayar kepada Heatrow Airport bagi 3 pesawat 747 nya setiap hari. Mind to share what are you studying and where? Thank you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fairul 0 Report post Posted June 23, 2006 for the new list, Toronto took over Narita as the most expensive landing fees..sometime around early this year..even EL AL will try to reduce frequency there..huhu Pearson landing fees tops globally Surpasses Tokyo's Narita to grab title of most expensive place to land a plane BRENT JANG TRANSPORTATION REPORTER TORONTO -- Toronto's Pearson International Airport has emerged as the world's most expensive place to land a plane, according to an annual survey. It cost $10,986 (U.S.) for a Boeing 747 jetliner, for example, to land at Pearson last year, said a report to be released today by the Air Transport Research Society. Tae Oum, the society's president and a professor at the University of British Columbia's Sauder School of Business, said two airports in Japan placed second and third -- Osaka's Kansai and Tokyo's Narita, which ranked as the priciest airport from 2001 through 2004. Last year, it cost $7,546 for a Boeing 747 to land at Kansai and $7,040 at Narita. Birmingham, England, came fourth on the list, with $7,013 in landing fees. The rise of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. currency contributed to Pearson taking the lead among 134 airports surveyed internationally. Prof. Oum added that Pearson did poorly in another category that measured operating efficiency. Other airports pull in a larger share of revenue from non-aeronautical sources such as retailing, fast food and leasing space to airport users, he said. For operating efficiency, Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson ranked first. Pearson's operator, the Greater Toronto Airports Authority, played down the significance of the survey, saying that airlines get more service for their money at Canada's largest airport. "We offer all-inclusive use of the gates and all the services that an airline would need. At other airports, it's an à la carte situation," said Scott Armstrong, the GTAA's manager of media relations. Executives at Air Canada and WestJet Airlines Ltd. have been urging Ottawa to reduce federal ground rent charged to airports, but Transport Minister Lawrence Cannon said last week that no rental breaks are planned beyond those already announced in 2005. Despite Mr. Cannon's comment, Pearson remains in talks with Transport Canada and is optimistic about developing a new formula to chop Toronto's ground rent, Mr. Armstrong said. "If that rent was lowered or eliminated, then we would be in a position to reduce landing fees. We've committed to passing on those savings to the airlines," he said. For an Airbus A320, Pearson also topped the 2005 list by charging $2,033 in landing fees. Next came Kansai ($1,537), Birmingham ($1,298) and Narita ($1,236). The first four annual surveys showed Narita as the world's most expensive airport, so the statistics for 2005 mark the first time that Pearson has outpaced all of its rivals after being runner-up in 2003 and 2004, the Prof. Oum noted. The study shows that Pearson's landing fees are more than double those charged at the second-priciest airport in North America, New York's LaGuardia, which levies $5,031 for a Boeing 747 to land. [Fishing the 747 out of the East River because it couldn't stop on the 7000' runways would cost a lot more!!! ] One of the society's research directors, Chunyan Yu, is scheduled to present the findings of the 400-page report at an industry conference today in Montreal. Industry analysts say that high landing fees are one of several challenges facing airlines. Other pressures include fierce fare wars, demands for wage increases from unions and soaring oil prices, Orion Securities Inc. analyst Ted Larkin said yesterday. Red-hot oil prices, after wreaking havoc in the industry in the past, may continue to do so in the future, he said at an airline investment conference in Toronto organized by Insight Information Co. Calin Rovinescu, a former senior executive at Air Canada who went on to help start Genuity Capital Markets, said investing in the airline industry isn't for the meek. Many investors have been burned when they opted to keep their airline stocks for the long term, but nimble speculators have profited by timing their purchases for the short term, he said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
E Faizal 0 Report post Posted June 23, 2006 Mind to share what are you studying and where? Thank you. Rin... i'm study "skolah pondok je" kat Ghanu... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth K 3 Report post Posted June 23, 2006 Mind asking why airport landing fees different? Facilities? Availibilty? Operating hour? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keith T 2 Report post Posted June 23, 2006 Jeez, it's no wonder airport taxes for my ticket to Japan are in excess of AUD450. One would think their airports run on bullions. :S Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
E Faizal 0 Report post Posted June 23, 2006 Jeez, it's no wonder airport taxes for my ticket to Japan are in excess of AUD450. One would think their airports run on bullions. :S Keith... Then come to Malaysia.. Tax will be cheap.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keith T 2 Report post Posted June 24, 2006 (edited) Keith... Then come to Malaysia.. Tax will be cheap.... That I am doing in September, if you check my signature. Edited June 24, 2006 by Keith T Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
S V Choong 4 Report post Posted June 24, 2006 Wow China does have some really expensive airport landing fee. They are even more expensive than HKG and SIN! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacky Goh 0 Report post Posted June 29, 2006 Airport Landing Fees..., How much for KLIA ? i thought u wan to land on KLIA hahahah Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth K 3 Report post Posted June 29, 2006 Airport Landing Fees..., How much for KLIA ? i thought u wan to land on KLIA hahahah I heard if a new airline start at KUL, the first year landing fee is free? I could be wrong Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tony 1 Report post Posted June 29, 2006 I heard if a new airline start at KUL, the first year landing fee is free? I could be wrong From what I read some time ago, first 2 years heavily-discounted and possibly waived... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KK Lee 5 Report post Posted June 29, 2006 Wow China does have some really expensive airport landing fee. They are even more expensive than HKG and SIN! Believe in China, the moment they have recovered their construction cost, the fees will be reduced. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sandeep G 1 Report post Posted June 30, 2006 From what I read some time ago, first 2 years heavily-discounted and possibly waived... and yet there are still only a few carriers that start (and soon terminate) services to KUL.. MAHB is better off spending the additional money from non-discounted landing fees on pax ammenities and maintenance of the airport facilities (airside and terminal).. Anybody seen the state of the aerotrain track and internal roads lately? no-maintainence culture Malaysia.. it's very sad.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
