Teoh Z Yao 0 Report post Posted May 26, 2007 Seen this guy's photos on a.net pretty often... Though he was some respectful photograper just like some of you... Surprising to know he's got some issues with him... <_> The underlined shouldhave been "thought". I mean he's got some faking problem... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
H Azmal 0 Report post Posted May 26, 2007 Has the guy ever been conclusively proven to be faking his photos? I mean sure his photos are dodgy but I'd like to see some concrete, absolute, conclusive, irrefutable, beyond doubt proof that he really is a fake. Not siding with him, no, but if I am going to judge him I'd like to be standing on some solid tangible facts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Imran K. 0 Report post Posted May 26, 2007 Has the guy ever been conclusively proven to be faking his photos? I mean sure his photos are dodgy but I'd like to see some concrete, absolute, conclusive, irrefutable, beyond doubt proof that he really is a fake. Not siding with him, no, but if I am going to judge him I'd like to be standing on some solid tangible facts. Then maybe you shouldn't judge him since the evidence we've procured doesnt comply with ur ethical obligations... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Fendy Report post Posted May 26, 2007 fake: maybe misleading: yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
H Azmal 0 Report post Posted May 27, 2007 Well, any progress so far? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Radzi 2 Report post Posted May 27, 2007 I can't conclusively say his photos are fake. In the last 3 photos, the UA, CI Dreamliner and CX Cargo, there is no evidence the aircraft was ever here in those airports. The photos themselves are nice though. But with clear blue sky behind, it can be anywhere. His MH B744 photo, I measured to be at 22 degress body angle rotation. Do our pilot do such a thing? I'm still asking the pilot community about this. Those people at A.net has no idea if the picture is statistically true or not. We the locals are the one who can prevent such an abuse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Radzi 2 Report post Posted May 27, 2007 Its ok now guys... all those aircraft have shifted to VHHH... OT: But how come a Twotter holding on threshold while another taking-off on an airport without taxiway...?? Ok, I think this case is closed. As for the Twotter and the MH B744 rotation, the jury is still out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gavin Andrew David 6 Report post Posted May 27, 2007 Ok, I think this case is closed. As for the Twotter and the MH B744 rotation, the jury is still out. Where where which shot? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chan CS 0 Report post Posted May 27, 2007 I think should be this one, http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1087321/L/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Radzi 2 Report post Posted May 27, 2007 Twotter : photo 1087321. MH rotation : photo 0895363 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Teoh Z Yao 0 Report post Posted May 27, 2007 Capt. Radzi, could it be an over-rotation? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tsentsan 0 Report post Posted May 27, 2007 This guy is really full of BS. Problem with most of his controversial photos is that its almost close to impossible to prove that it was done. I mean, we all know that when you rotate a 744 to that angle, and with a MAN payload, it would probably have smacked into the ground. Even if we go through all the s#1t proving that a MAN flight couldnt rotate at such an angle, he can always say he heard wrongly and it was going to SZB instead which might explain the angle... Dont waste your breath on this guy la... not worth it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth K 3 Report post Posted May 27, 2007 I still dun understand the whole issue, the CI and UA one is definitely not from here. UA probably at SIN, the CI from his fav city HKG. But the MH744 rotation, is fake? Issit photoshop? help me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tsentsan 0 Report post Posted May 28, 2007 I still dun understand the whole issue, the CI and UA one is definitely not from here. UA probably at SIN, the CI from his fav city HKG. But the MH744 rotation, is fake? Issit photoshop? help me How many B744s have you seen rotating at that angle? If you've watched the long haul flights, you'd notice the 744s struggling to get airborne... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth K 3 Report post Posted May 28, 2007 How many B744s have you seen rotating at that angle? If you've watched the long haul flights, you'd notice the 744s struggling to get airborne... One in a billion perhaps? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mohd Idham 0 Report post Posted May 28, 2007 Seth, that 744 case, what tsentsan means is impossible..its like you wanna bring front wheel up of your Harley Davidson chopper bike.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tsentsan 0 Report post Posted May 28, 2007 Seth, that 744 case, what tsentsan means is impossible..its like you wanna bring front wheel up of your Harley Davidson chopper bike.. I think wheelieing a HD bike maybe still possible... but wheelieing a RapidKL bus isnt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Richard A 0 Report post Posted May 28, 2007 http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1216432/L/ Hmm, right... Not only is the angle not good for the plane, but where's the heat distortion from the exhaust on the mountain? Seems a bit suspicious to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chan CS 0 Report post Posted May 29, 2007 Whoa!! He is really "modifying" plane!!! And he likes 747 very much!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth K 3 Report post Posted May 29, 2007 Both CI and UA picture been changed to HKG Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Walter Sim 1 Report post Posted May 29, 2007 Wah, the Bullet @@ ROller coaster!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
