Jump to content
MalaysianWings - Malaysia's Premier Aviation Portal

kingkong

Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About kingkong

  • Rank

  1. Bro...trust me, demand can be created at a right price. Filling up a daily A380 is never a problem be it CDG, FRA, AMS or even LHR. The only problem is filling up the A380 at the right yield to match the cost. Bear in mind that operating cost for A380 differs greatly between airlines as aircraft operating consist of many variables and direct operating cost.
  2. Hmmm.... I don't think so. Too many issues with A380 flying to both SYD and NRT. I wouldn't be surprised if MAS changed their mind again. Anyway, we'll just have to wait and see. My problem is that I still love the 744 aircraft and it is going out of system soon. Double daily A380 to London maybe ???
  3. Why didn't the crew announce that the pax has to insert coins to have the oxygen mask come out !!!! :-) Those mask that came out automatically is because the passenger has paid for that facilities in advance (without them realising it !!! Hehehe) I guess this MKX must the old A332 aircraft.
  4. This Emirates/Qantas deal will only benefit MAS on the possibility of JV with BA for the Kangaroo route only if MAS mount additional capacity into Australian cities. By end of this year the 744 is gone and it is unlikely 777 will be used for all Australian cities. The next best aircraft would be the new A330 for the KUL-Australian services. MAS London A380 can go double daily if there is enough capacityfrom KUL onwards for the kangaroo route. Otherwise, it will be another big humoungous white elephant especially the MH4/1 flights on the KUL-LHR-KUL sector. It is already white by the way, just need to re-attach the trunk. :-)
  5. NRT is a wrong destination for MAS to fly the A380
  6. Is SYD the next destination for the A380 ? Why don't they fly A380 into AMS. I'm sure there will be more demand due to the codeshare agreement with KLM.
×
×
  • Create New...