Jump to content
MalaysianWings - Malaysia's Premier Aviation Portal

Andrew Lim

Silver Member
  • Content Count

    294
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Andrew Lim


  1. Wrong ! :p

     

    (I have been led to believe) the RMAF's F-18's are impotent. Hence, even losing the entire fleet of eight should in theory not cause any loss of firepower :blink:

     

    Now, the potential destructive power of a US Navy aircraft carrier .................... :)

     

    RMAF's F-18 are not impotent as such, but rather, they need to get permission from uncle sam before shooting.


  2. Nice...but surely a better way to take an airfield would be to take out enemy radars and then paradropping a whole regiment of troops into the arifield.

     

    That way, you dont expose multi million dollar fighter jets to triple A barrage and u get to capture enemy equipment/aircraft intact.

     

    Our airforce is not very big and the RMAF losing a single F-18 is akin to the US Navy losing an aircraft carrier


  3. I have another question related to this:

     

    Are all airliners equipped with ELT? If so, why does it seem that on some plane crashes, the SAR team simply takes ages to locate the crash site?

     

    And if the ELT activation is dependent upon the rate of deceleration, does that mean it won't activate if a plane were to stall, hit the ground at a low speed, and then start to pusing here and there before stopping?

     


  4. Whether the 777 was taxiing on the wrong taxiway or not . Ground shouldn't have issued pushback clearance until the 777 was clear .

     

    On the other hand , Push back truck driver blind ah ?

     

     

    Maybe China Eastern and China Southern don't like each other and they wanna take things to another level.


  5. From what I heard, it's the 'source code' for weapons release that was witheld by the US when they sold RMAF the F/A-18Ds.

     

    Without the codes, you can still arm our Hornets with any missiles or bombs but they can never leave the rails...

     

    How true this is, I don't know... sounds like someone from our ministry of defence forgot to read the contract document for the purchase...


  6. Now if the govt and MPs had kept a closer eye on MAS operations during the ex-CEO's reign, MAS might not be in this lousy financial shape at the moment and end up having to distribute routes to Air Asia, now would it?

     

    The fact is that the govt had failed in their duty to safeguard the national carrier against possible misuse of funds by CEOs so now they end up with financial difficulties.

    And since they (the govt) keep preaching about meritrocracy, they should let a more able airline handle some of the routes.

     

    <<Members of Parliament (MPs), Tuesday questioned AirAsia's commitment in fulfilling its responsibility to the nation since the Low Cost Carrier (LCC) was only interested in profit.>>

     

    What a stupid statement by MPs. An airline is a business and the main purpose of a business is to make profit! Not to serve the goverment's wishes! :angry:

     

     

    i dont wan to coment on the bridge issue as it is an inappropriate topic for this forum but i do agree that Malaysia needs to be much firmer with her neighbours.


  7. Last month, i was on Air Asia's new A320 travelling from KUL - BKI.

     

    After we've landed at BKI, the passengers had a long wait in the cabin b4 disembarking due to 'masalah teknikal'. Both engines were kept running all the time when the aircraft was parked on the tarmac.

     

    In the end, after 10 mins or so, the captain announced that we hav to get off the plane from the right hand side coz number 1 engine cannot be shut down.

     

    See the attached pic that i took as i was disembarking. Note engine 1 is really still running.

     

    IPB Image

     

     

    Strange huh... engine can't start, Ive heard of... but this is the first time I've experienced someone not able to shut down engines....

     

    Just pull the fuel cut off switch cannot meh?

     

    Or maybe APU is broken so he had to keep one engine running?


  8. I like the F-16... but it is an unstable jet to fly....

     

    On the sidenote, does anyone remember this movie called 'Afterburn' about 15 years ago...

     

    It was based on a true story,apparently... about how the widow of a dead F-16 pilot uncovered some technical design flaw in the early F-16 models which the USAF wanted to keep under wraps...

     

    Any truth in the movie? wink.gif


  9. Last time I was at RMAF museum, the canopy of that skyhawk was open. I climbed in and sat in it... excellent feeling.

     

    However, no ejection seat. Only got an office swivel chair! blink.gif

     

    Also, I looked at the plane from the rear, big hole, no engine also.


  10. Andrew,

     

    Same camera as mine  :rolleyes:

     

    How do you regard it as to aircraft-photography ???

    1192[/snapback]

     

    What a coincidence eh... :lol:

     

    The S304 has really slow shutter speed and i cannot find a way to speed it up.

     

    Thus I think it's a terrible camera for aircraft photography, unless your snapping at static ones.

     

    The picture quality is pretty good though.

×
×
  • Create New...