Jump to content
MalaysianWings - Malaysia's Premier Aviation Portal

Edwin P K

Gold Member
  • Content Count

    701
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Edwin P K


  1.  

    can you please detail your redemption route and what it cost you in miles and RM?

     

    KUL-LHR-CPH return, Enrich Miles 61050, tax RM700. And Enrich Miles required is higher because can redemption can be done only via phone. Unrewarding? For me it's rewarding, especially you get seats for the dates that you want to travel!

     

    Enrich also has seasonal offers which gives you 20-30% discounts, for instance London is now 20% off .

     

    http://www.malaysiaairlines.com/etc/designs/default/canvas/content/campaigns/enrichWorld/english/2015-dwor-feb-apr/jcr%3Acontent/importer/home.html#!/enrich-offers?p=europe-uk&t=text


  2. In my years with Krisflyer, I never got any redemption seats, save for one or two one-way upgrades.

     

    But in my current years with Enrich, all my Enrich miles are spent with redemption booking, and easily so. As a matter of fact, will be on one with MH and then on BA in next few days.

     

    So perhaps you can give some examples.


  3. MH does have sub par product, especially when compared with their regional competitors.

     

    7th Feb: KUL->HKG (MH 448)

    16275261499_48cabd4765_b.jpg

     

    3rd May: HKG->KUL (CX 791)

    17169288228_c139913a07_b.jpg

     

    The nasi lemak was had just a spicy taste, whereas the ginger chicken on CX was pretty damn good. Apart from that, the service was a world of difference. I felt like the CX crew's performance was at the level of any business class, at least I felt so. The difference was even more obvious when you can compare them side by side like this.

     

    But the worst food on this leg was definitely AA. Appalling service and food through and through. If there's any consolation for MH, they are still better than any American airlines but this is not good enough when you have the likes of SQ and CX.


  4. Actually this 40th anniversary is a sad event.

     

    Those pioneers who attended the party should be sad that what they had built up in the early years was destroyed by one man.

     

    What has MH to show after 40 years? Right now, its commercial viability is questionable. It is sick and bankrupt. It would have been wound up long ago if the government had not been its owner.

     

    Maybe that was the REAL reason why one of the pilots was in tears!


  5. Saw the MH A380 at klia for the first time ...... The livery is the weakest design of all the A380s I've seen ..... The design doesn't do justice to aircraft ... In fact it made it look stumpy and small.....the kite on tail looks sad and sorry and disconnected from the rest og the aircraft.....why did MH have to blow ths fantastic chance to change ?

     

    I like SQ , AF and LH, even the China Southern design has more presence !

     

    MH , please change the new logo !!!

     

    Personally, this is the best looking livery yet, it's elegant, simple and really modern, and it befits the aircraft. I only wish that this direction could translate to the whole MH team. Lean & agile, and not cumbersome.

     

    Can't say the same about the interior though.

×
×
  • Create New...