Jump to content
MalaysianWings - Malaysia's Premier Aviation Portal

Sandeep G

Platinum Member
  • Content Count

    2,087
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Sandeep G


  1. Tbh - the layout is ok - but the second satellite plans in their original form would make it a bit messy.. but if they were to redesign the sections between the two satellite terminals and integrate them (including "rejigging" the standalone Aerotrain Maintenance Building), they could make it work with even more gates on the Southern side (narrowbodies/MARS). The current airside access way and roundabout may need to be sunk  a little further to permit building/apron operations atop - but doable. Only consideration/issue is where the existing fuel line infrastructure resides in the sub-soil. And ofcourse, unlike T2, they should not stinge on the Rigid Pavement for aircraft stands/aprons. 


  2. On 8/12/2023 at 6:51 PM, jahur said:

    SAS is only letting go 2 a350 though which MH is already midway taking. The remaining 3 are A330-300Enhanced equipped with trent 700 which is also not technically the same as the Neo's trent 7000. Dont think kedekut MH has to stomach to operate PW 4170,  RRTrent 700 plus 7000 up to 2027.

    As of now with the 2 SAS frames out there's about less than 11 left + - . Compared to earlier this year nearly 30plus but note some were taken and lease back by their former operators.

    Good to see the fleet developing. I believe there might also be some "Azul" A350s up for grabs from Brazil. 


  3. Would perhaps be a little too simplistic of my assuming - but given that the current Aerotrains operate on a wheel based (not railed system) platform, would a temporary use of these devices (modified perhaps by way of ensuring the platforms may accommodate the train rather than vice-versa) to temporarily run on one (or both) of the aerotrain lines to keep the service running conveniently.. but at least in my thoughts, it seems more plausible/realistic having such a service ready perhaps even by year end as oppose to the end-2024 projections for the new line - and would be some degree of respite for the airport and passenger/customer feel alike. Iskandar Malaysia BRT starts three-month pilot testing - paultan.org


  4. On 6/9/2023 at 9:23 AM, JuliusWong said:

    Let's not forget Changi T2 is now opened again after massive renovation during pandemic, 18 months ahead of schedule. :)  Singapore well know that their carrier can no longer compete with big cash loaded airlines like EK, TK, and QR, upcoming RX and SV, hence they are focusing on pax transit markets and premium market. The LCC are fillers for Changi. Being a global financial and business hub, having strong consistent policies helps its standing in competitive world. Downsides you get pigeonhole home and less than ideal democracy, well you can't have the cake and eat it at the same time, same as any other countries.

    Just flew out of T2... apart from the departure hall and arrival hall... the Airside duty-free and amenity level is still very much the same as before - ZERO CHANGE - probably why they opening 18 months "ahead of schedule" as I recall the ENTIRE terminal was supposed to be refreshed in phases originally... Lots of hoardings around the shops with some outlet refreshing for sure. Ceiling panels in some areas changed, others not. Carpet change in some areas, mainly not. All lounges are the same as pre-pandemic... The McDonalds and Food-Court on upper level airside area identical.

    The F52-F60 Pier was IDENTICAL to before the closure.. all gate lounges have the same tired chairs, slightly damp smell and poor natural lighting along the travellators. Notably, F60 (CIP/VIP gate) has a lick of paint and fresh new carpeting plus some pot plants along the connecting pier.

    I did notice at the walkway towards F31-F47, there is a new structure built - not sure if this is ahead of possible demolition of the F42-F47 (& similarly E Finger Pier) gates to permit a double parallel taxiway, which is currently missing from T2 side. 


  5. Just tried the new J class and Y class seats to and fro BKI respectively.

    I know there are comments here that don't favour - but tbh - I really found them quite good. More space and better comfort in the lower back area. Direct comparison with EY Seats on SIN-KUL vv sectors. Old seats are crammed and feel claustrophobic. 

    New seats in EY could still definitely have used an adjustable head rest though - that I will agree. 

    I'm 6ft 2 btw. 


  6. 14 hours ago, Lim Kar Yong said:

    My Australian ETA states that my given name is "unknown"  while my full name is my Last Name  😁

    This is why although our passport is certified as ePassport - we can't use the e-Gates in Australia - because they need to have the Surname/Family Name separate from the First/Given Names. This is the format that most other countries use - and actually the individuals name on the Biodata page is listed under

    Family Name/Surname: Kennedy

    Given Names: John Fitzgerald

    In Malaysian context; simply - Name: John Fitzgerald Kennedy

     

    So all the time ETA and e-Passport gates in other countries kelang kabut and we can't use despite the convenience. 


  7. Long long since I posted anything.

    Nice subtle hint of a new variation of the Wau on the Tail? 

    I know people will yell, scream, rant and rave "inconsistent branding" - but not bad la :)

    The industry faces headwinds in the coming months and a tapered growth plan, without over-stating plans and ambitions that would otherwise later to have to be shelved/KIV'd, I think the measured pace at which MH is unravelling itself from seemingly years of "uncertainty" is admirable, respectful and reflective of its foundation years.

    When people talk about SQ vs MH.. yup - there are differences - but respectively, and from the anecdotes and tales of past.. the "Hare" can always end up being stunned by the "Tortoise/Turtle" at the finish line. 😉 


  8. Apalah bala yang menimpa ni?

     

    Why can't we have good things to last?

     

    This is akin to the double B772 blows. But this time is a double highly reputable CEOs leaving the ship.

    I think you seriously need to reconsider that last statement... what kind of a fool are you to draw such a comparison?

  9. If it is the same national carrier I have in mind, then please don't - lest their early arrival conjure up similar farce as that befallen upon the semi-premium/half-LCC indeterminate breed domiciled in same country as afore-mentioned national carrier :D

    Ah yes, but such farcical antics are but the bread and butter of said national carrier - especially given that said nations aviation regulator had been blindsided by the semi-premium/half-LCD indeterminate breed carriers farcical fleet planning in a year that the international organization of aviation is conducting an oversight review of said nations aviation system that could, should said review be of negative outcome, result in adverse consequences for future fleet acquisitions of the original aforementioned national carrier as a result of restrictions similar to that of a neighboring nation to the said nation in question. Alas - I conjure bullshit arguments for pure entertainment nowadays for it is known to release the inner keyboard warrior responses. Let such flow, now.

     

    By the way. On a separate note, such administration of airlines should be carefully reviewed and studied to understand the wider implications of the extensive cost pressures upon airlines resulting from the ever-broadening spectrum of operating business models. Alitalia... Air Berlin... Monarch.. what is happening to Europe is the result of a brewing storm over the last 20-25 years - that seems to be how long it takes for LCCs to completely destabilize their full service compatriots. Who is next?

     

    This is coming approximately 16 years after shock-consolidation (9-11 the proverbial nail) and administration in the US industry.. on a trend basis - one could foreshadow a similar instance in the Asia-Pacific in the not-too-distant future, with an erosion of distinction in services amongst the major legacy carriers already apparent; and airlines already venturing into dynamic operating models - departing from traditional business streams whilst trying to buck the trend almost like salmon swimming upstream to spawn... not all are gonna make it past the "bear" market conditions that are inevitable.. and those that do are going to be extremely worn and post flat results for years before the resurgence takes place... and that resurgence is realy hard to predict and understand especially given the violent cyclical nature of the global economy and its sporadic reaction to shock - often knee-jerk as a result of mindless information processing..

     

    Interesting, but somewhat worrying times ahead..

     

    On that note, signing off as an active member from MalaysianWings.com

    It has been a great number of years - wonderful people met that I shall continue friendships with beyond this forum.. cheers all. Safe landings, always.


  10.  

    This MoU is a rushed announcement and lacking in substance. I don't think you will get a delivery schedule until the order is firm.

    That was precisely the point I was raising, Flee - in continuation from my opening "doom and gloom" statement.

     

    2019 now seems to be legit.. and airframe leases can be 1 year or 2 years.. so candidly, one could expect MAB a333/332 leases to be for up to 3 years and then phase out with 789 deliveries.. seems like there is some order in the house.

     

    Remember, MH grew phenomenally in the 90s with 6 DC-10s and 10 744s.. fleet right-sizing could be the best way forward for sustainable profitability.

     

    As to the US regulations for minimum seat size - you are correct. But that is a US motivation, based on their local market requirements and feedback.. plus size passengers having to purchase two seats etc and a consumer feedback driven economy would do that.. how likely is MAVCoMm to impose similar requirements in Malaysia???

×
×
  • Create New...