Jump to content
MalaysianWings - Malaysia's Premier Aviation Portal

Timothy

Gold Member
  • Content Count

    525
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Timothy


  1. Personally, I do not think that London will ever be a victim to network trimming ... it just is too important a route to be on the chopping block.

     

    I have travelled a few times on the KUL-LHR-KUL routes on board the B744s and A380s ... and the loads each time was pretty impressive. MAS still offers a far superior value proposition than many other carriers between Europe/London and Asia.

     

    KC Sim

     

    Agree on the yields, but value would have to go to Emirates, Thai, Bruneian, Qatar, Etihad.


  2. My 2cents :

     

    1. Offer the domestic market to AirAsia for a nice sum, in exchange for their international routes out of KUL.

    Rationale : AK domestic fares are catching up with MH , while MH international fares are dropping to meet AirAsia X. May as well play to your strengths. Also this wouldn't affect AirAsia JV's to operate within other countries given immediate connectivity to emerging markets.

     

    2. Rural Air Service (Borneo) to introduce amphibious aircraft.

    Rationale : Smaller aircraft for flexible schedules. Low cost & low impact compared to building an airstrip to connect every rural community.

     

    3. Re-Invent the market.

    Rationale : Strip out first class services and replace with "NetJets/VistaJets" copy ? With Malaysian companies now looking abroad for opportunities, jet charter could be the next thing for ASEAN. OneWorld links will still be there for anyone who prefers a traditional first class experience.

     

    4. Singapore

    Rationale : Plenty of shared history between SQ & MH. This could be the "Qantas and Emirates" story for us. Synergies with Point 3 above, and positions KLIA as a domestic/regional airport while Changi becomes the Europe/America/NZ gateway for Malaysians.


  3. The followings were pax load on MH4 for last 1 week. So I just wonder where Dr Frazier got his figure from.

    Even on 12 Feb it was 157 pax

    7 Feb - 247

    8 Feb - 368

    9 Feb - 401

    10 Feb - 346

    11 Feb - 249

    12 Feb - 157

    Today 13 Feb - 308

     

    Probably just abit of hyperbole :) 157 spread across the A380 is still pretty thin I'd say, just 20+ more than the entire upper deck seating (C & Y)


  4. Looking into this as I've never been to a RedBull event let alone an air-race !

     

    Tickets are split into Prelim (Saturday), Final (Sunday) or Weekend (Both days). Anybody has hints on which is best to go to for spotting ?

     

    Also it shows the race as ending @ 3am on Monday morning ! Is this when the actual racing ends or is it just an after party ?

     

    Official Link here : http://www.redbullairrace.com/en_US/event/putrajaya


  5. I know that this has been a common complain in this forum but what is the most effective way to claim retro miles. I have used the Enrich website and also submitted emails to them 3 times but to no avail. I do not normally trave down to Sentral (out of the way for me). Is there an office in KLIA for this? Any advise guys?

     

    Drop them a call, 1300883000 . I did it last week and miles were credited within 5 minutes !


  6.  

    Source: Flightglobal

     

    Oh my.. a few factors..

    1. Wrong aircraft type code
    2. Cleared for a height probably not suitable for commercial airliner
    3. Pilot distracted due to conversation with customer

     

     

    IMHO the factors in the article paints the whole picture, but the main reason / subject for this Controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) would be disregard of instruments by flight crew.

     

    Why would they think the equipment was malfunctioning ? Is Russian technology so prone to failure ?

     

    I thought after the Überlingen mid-air collision, the Russians have been trained to rely more on instruments over human directions. (ATC okay-ing 6000ft)

×
×
  • Create New...