Jump to content
MalaysianWings - Malaysia's Premier Aviation Portal

Ruiz Razy

Silver Member
  • Content Count

    370
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ruiz Razy


  1. Wonder how soon will the replacement order b for 772s . Better act fast as backlog n delivery dates for 350s / dreamliners / 77Ws is increasingly taking longeeeer ! Do remember , flying the antique planes is one of the detterant factor of choosing an airline in this region. Unless of course the amenities n products r consistently upgraded . My last MH 772 flight on business has began showing signs of age .


  2. Nooooooooo!!!! :angry: I want MH to keep the twice daily flights out of SYD even if D7 starts flying there. I fly out of SYD so often (well, often enough) on MH that their schedule really suits me!

    Anyway, MH really shouldn't reduce the frequency of flights into SYD. They offer reasonably good connections to the rest of their network from both flights.

    ...but their network is reducing to almost nothing !


  3. The way I interpret it, the new airline will get brand new planes with Boeing Sky Interior and different interior. It will probably be more luxurious and have fewer seats. This will make it easier for pax when they fly to destinations more than 4 hours.

     

    MH will probably soldier on (for a limited period of time) with the existing planes while the new airline builds up its route network. They will probably phase out the B734s once the new airline has sufficient new planes to take over.

     

    By the time 738 sky interior r in place of the 734s , it will b out of date ; as newer 737MAX Is out ! ... Back to square one

    BTW can't the "clean slate" be throughout the narrow n wide bodies.?


  4. Is there a need to go to DFW? AA already have a presence at LAX (2nd biggest after UA) so I don't think it's necessary.

    Don't know; but QF has just started flights to DFW as it is centrally located in the US, minimizes time for transfer and flying time to other areas in the US. Location and operation wise sounds sensible , but economics may be otherwise.

     

    Frankly, it will be convenient for those intend to travel to Mid West or Central US .


  5. Further questions and wishes as an Enrich Member and a Malaysian... ( of my mind, i'm sure there's more..)

    1 Rather c MH b transferred to T5 @ LHR rather than moving back to the "densed" T3

    2 Wonders will MH do similar move as QF by flying to DFW ( AA's "central" hub in the US)

    3 Will this be a platform for Joint European and M/East Expansion for MH / QF and others within the OneWorld Fraternity from KUL? , Would love to c MUC , ARN, ZRH or even MAD / BCN online from KUL ( considering IB is in as well) or for that matter more AMN flights ( either RJ or perhaps MH ). Or for that matter MAN ?

    4 Implications on their respective "dependents" a.k.a. JQ /3K and FY, perhaps if MAN ( or others for that matter) of a "low cost" / low yield route ; will we c maybe FY / JQ flying to these places.

    5 We still need some form of Enrich benefits for FY, similar to 3K / JQ.

    6 Sincerely hope MH Enrich would start something similar to QF's recently introduced Smart Baggage Tags, Smart FQTV Cards.

    7 Will this be a platform to ultimately create something further than codeshare to like joint shuttle KUL - HKG with CX , say 8 - 10 flights a day ? Where one can just by a "shuttle tkt" and just turn up at the airport. After all it's just 3 hours away n the commercial links r getting strong.

    8 Synergies for a common Lounge , similar to QF - BA at key airports @ NRT / HKG / DXB ...etc.

    9 Will there be a massive transfer to a common terminal for this fraternity? Examples SIN - MH T2 is not the same as BA or QF ? Minimise walking distance for transfers?

×
×
  • Create New...