New registrations require administration validation. This may delay registration approvals.
Reach out to us on our Facebook Page for faster approvals
Boeing Built Deadly Assumptions Into 737 Max, Blind to a Late Design Change
Posted 02 June 2019 - 03:30 PM
A year before the plane was finished, Boeing made the system more aggressive and riskier. While the original version relied on data from at least two types of sensors, the ultimate used just one, leaving the system without a critical safeguard. In both doomed flights, pilots struggled as a single damaged sensor sent the planes into irrecoverable nose-dives within minutes, killing 346 people and prompting regulators around the world to ground the Max.
But many people involved in building, testing and approving the system, known as MCAS, said they hadnt fully understood the changes. Current and former employees at Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration who spoke with The New York Times said they had assumed the system relied on more sensors and would rarely, if ever, activate. Based on those misguided assumptions, many made critical decisions, affecting design, certification and training.
It doesnt make any sense, said a former test pilot who worked on the Max. I wish I had the full story.
Read more here:
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users