Jump to content


Icon Important Announcement!

New registrations require administration validation. This may delay registration approvals.


Photo

Incident: Malaysia A333 at Brisbane on Jul 18th 2018, unreliable airspeed, hydraulic leak


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 flee

flee
  • Platinum Member
  • 11,128 posts

Posted 19 July 2018 - 10:25 AM

A Malaysia Airlines Airbus A330-300, registration 9M-MTK performing flight MH-134 from Brisbane,QL (Australia) to Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), was in the initial climb out of Brisbane's runway 01 when upon contacting departure the crew declared PAN PAN PAN reporting their airspeed was unreliable.

 

More:

http://avherald.com/...=4bb4f5b3&opt=0



#2 JuliusWong

JuliusWong
  • Platinum Member
  • 2,831 posts

Posted 19 July 2018 - 12:16 PM

https://www.thestar....litch-says-mas/

#3 BC Tam

BC Tam
  • Platinum Member
  • 7,299 posts

Posted 19 July 2018 - 02:15 PM

When I first read about MH134 being stranded, I was somehow reminded of Terry's recollection of his 'adventure' at SGN earlier :)
http://www.malaysian...ic=21233&page=4

Edited by BC Tam, 19 July 2018 - 02:16 PM.


#4 jahur

jahur
  • Gold Member
  • 901 posts

Posted 19 July 2018 - 04:57 PM

Hydraulic leakage and oil all over the taxiway. It was a good call by the crew to return back ASAP regardless of the overweight landing.

#5 Mohd Firdaus Bolong

Mohd Firdaus Bolong
  • Silver Member
  • 388 posts

Posted 21 July 2018 - 11:55 PM

Theres an aviation account on twitter @Aircrashmayday saying the aircraft took off with several pitot tubes still covered thus the unreliable airspeed. Is this true?

#6 KK Lee

KK Lee
  • Platinum Member
  • 5,003 posts

Posted 22 July 2018 - 12:06 AM

Could unreliable airspeed caused by hydraulic leak or separate event/incident?

#7 Ja Singh

Ja Singh
  • Silver Member
  • 468 posts

Posted 22 July 2018 - 01:43 AM

Could unreliable airspeed caused by hydraulic leak or separate event/incident?

Due unaable to correctly certify speed it made a super hard landing damaging front nose gear,possibly hydraulic leak and could not taxi on it own poeer anymore

#8 flee

flee
  • Platinum Member
  • 11,128 posts

Posted 22 July 2018 - 03:02 PM

We await the ATSB investigation findings.... I like it when accidents to Malaysian aircraft take place in Australia - we are assured of a proper and professional investigation. In Malaysia, we don't often see the final reports of accidents.



#9 Chris Tan

Chris Tan
  • Gold Member
  • 749 posts

Posted 22 July 2018 - 11:18 PM

I like it when accidents to Malaysian aircraft take place in Australia

I like it when accidents to Malaysian aircraft don't happen at all



#10 Mushrif A

Mushrif A
  • Platinum Member
  • 3,505 posts

Posted 23 July 2018 - 08:24 AM

Theres an aviation account on twitter @Aircrashmayday saying the aircraft took off with several pitot tubes still covered thus the unreliable airspeed. Is this true?

 

 

It was on the TV news in Australia. All three remained covered.

 

So, who's fault was it? The ground handler-engineer? The pilot doing the walkaround?



#11 wee c k

wee c k
  • Members
  • 31 posts

Posted 23 July 2018 - 08:40 AM

If all 3 were covered, they wouldnt have any speed indicator at all. They will abort it before even reaching half of the runaway.

#12 Kenny Sing

Kenny Sing
  • Members
  • 110 posts

Posted 23 July 2018 - 01:39 PM

is the aircraft going for some wash or checks in brisbane that requires the pitots to be covered?



#13 Radzi

Radzi
  • Platinum Member
  • 4,520 posts

Posted 23 July 2018 - 03:08 PM

is the aircraft going for some wash or checks in brisbane that requires the pitots to be covered?

 BNE got some problem with wasps.....

 

http://www.flightsaf...-but-dangerous/



#14 Sandeep G

Sandeep G
  • Platinum Member
  • 2,189 posts

Posted 24 July 2018 - 10:21 AM

BNE Operational requirement calls for the covers to be removed 20 mins prior pushback.. most flight crew walkarounds are completed approximately 40-30 mins ahead of departure

Edited by Sandeep G, 24 July 2018 - 10:22 AM.


#15 Mushrif A

Mushrif A
  • Platinum Member
  • 3,505 posts

Posted 24 July 2018 - 10:46 AM

If all 3 were covered, they wouldnt have any speed indicator at all. They will abort it before even reaching half of the runaway.

 

I checked again the photo and it shows 2 were covered.



#16 Kenny Sing

Kenny Sing
  • Members
  • 110 posts

Posted 24 July 2018 - 10:54 AM

thanks for the sharing capt



#17 leon t

leon t
  • Gold Member
  • 602 posts

Posted 24 July 2018 - 12:42 PM

interestingly if its really something to do with  the pitot tubes and not all covers removed then it something not right and with MAS too. As it  seems other foreign airlines and even aussie carriers like Qantas never had this issue from Brisbane or any other aust airports before.


Edited by leon t, 24 July 2018 - 12:43 PM.


#18 Mike P

Mike P
  • Platinum Member
  • 1,623 posts

Posted 30 July 2018 - 09:57 AM

Has anyone heard about the recent MH's fiasco on the BNE to KUL and LHR to KUL that have some technical issues and causing very unpleasant experience to passengers?



#19 KK Lee

KK Lee
  • Platinum Member
  • 5,003 posts

Posted 30 July 2018 - 04:33 PM

Has anyone heard about the recent MH's fiasco on the BNE to KUL and LHR to KUL that have some technical issues and causing very unpleasant experience to passengers?


Malaysia Airlines, in particular, MH3 from Londons Heathrow Airport to Kuala Lumpur, should be renamed the airline from hell. Ask the passengers who were stranded at Heathrow on Friday, July 27.

They received an email at 0300 hours on Friday morning, to inform them that their flight, which should have departed at 10.45am London time, would be delayed till 12 noon.

Who reads emails at that ungodly hour? A few more hours in bed would have been appreciated. Some passengers had also flown in from Europe.

Some had purchased tickets the day before. If they had known, about the delays, they would have chosen another airline.

When the MAS passengers checked-in at Heathrow, they found closed check-in counters. When asked, the few unhelpful ground crew employees sitting behind their desks would point towards another area of the huge complex, and say Go there. No reason was forthcoming. There was apparently Counter 1 of the MAS Customer Services desk, where a long queue was visible.

Whilst dragging his trolley towards Counter 1, a redirected passenger would pass around 70 people, in another queue. These MAS passengers had allegedly been told to gather for hotel bookings. Around the corner, was a third queue of 50, or more, passengers, who were told a different story.

More from
https://m.malaysiaki.../columns/436470

#20 Chris Tan

Chris Tan
  • Gold Member
  • 749 posts

Posted 30 July 2018 - 04:45 PM

An Airbus A380 fits around 550 passengers. This is the summer holiday.

What nonsense.

Everybody knows the Airbus A380-841 seats 850 in the summer and 900 in the winter.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users