jani 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2016 I told my bosses to rename AirAsia in return Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kee Hooi Yen 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2016 I told my bosses to rename AirAsia in return Like LCC Asia ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Najib Ramli 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2016 I think this is childish. MAHB should just ignore Air Asia's latest stunt. indeed, funny a company that is so cost conscious is actually spending money for such unnecessary re-branding...but then again its AirAsia, "they're always right" (so they say that is.....) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mohd Firdaus Bolong 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2016 I think what they planned to do.. Rename the terminal to lcct2, then the whole world bought into the new name. Then AK will demand "now you call it lcct, take away the aerobridges, lower the fees.", now that the whole world is calling it LCCT2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BC Tam 2 Report post Posted June 21, 2016 I told my bosses to rename AirAsia in return Hah hah hah Imagine if it escalates to point where 'Air Asia' and logo are replaced with "THAT AIRLINE" on FIDs at MAHB airports Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Waiping 12 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 I think what they planned to do.. Rename the terminal to lcct2, then the whole world bought into the new name. Then AK will demand "now you call it lcct, take away the aerobridges, lower the fees.", now that the whole world is calling it LCCT2. My exact sentiment too, or if you can't rename it then we demanded a LCCT! Hah hah hah Imagine if it escalates to point where 'Air Asia' and logo are replaced with "THAT AIRLINE" on FIDs at MAHB airports You should know by now that AirAsia is hardly LCC, so why name it LCCT? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Azri 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 I am not sure what kind of stunt AK is playing now. They seems to come up with one issue after another and has been behaving like a spoiled brat. They will be seen more and more as aloof and arrogant if they continue along this path. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mushrif A 3 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 So if we want klia to be a bigger LCC hub, maybe the ministry could consider giving operating licences to Nok or Tigerair to set-up local units in M'sia so that they can also operate domestically, amongst others. That would make Airasia "happy" that it no longer has a monopoly on the local LCC scene. And maybe we will have less drama-queen antics from the Red one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J. Suri 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 So if we want klia to be a bigger LCC hub, maybe the ministry could consider giving operating licences to Nok or Tigerair to set-up local units in M'sia so that they can also operate domestically, amongst others. That would make Airasia "happy" that it no longer has a monopoly on the local LCC scene. And maybe we will have less drama-queen antics from the Red one. Actually looking forward for that kind of competition too. My two cents worth... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sharil Abdul Rahman 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 The problem that i see is that once we have Tiger and Nok in, saturation will be at a high level - and more antics may pop up. Sad to see Rayani go. Also still waiting to see if Mojo will ever get their mojo around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
V Wong 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 totally agreed with this one.... if only AK start to falter and turn into red only then i believe they will move their hub to DMK. Btw what is the benefit of changing this KLIA2 to LCCT2 ? Will the tix price for AK becoming cheaper or the efficiency of the airport become better / less water pounding? endless possibilities.. LCC connotation of low cost = cheap. Not so, for me. Over the past 12 months, my travel with AirAsia group has dropped tremendously, to a grand total of 2 sectors. For my travel needs, FSCs are providing better value at the moment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KK Lee 5 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 Whether is named lcct2, klia2 or terminal 2, is the same poorly designed, pax unfriendly and airline inefficient terminal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JuliusWong 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 Whether is named lcct2, klia2 or terminal 2, is the same poorly designed, pax unfriendly and airline inefficient terminal. Thank you summary. Some of us here needs to take a business course before commenting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KK Lee 5 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 (edited) Thank you summary. Some of us here needs to take a business course before commenting.The row could be a pretext for the highest authority to rename it to some neutral name like Simba, Mufasa, Scar or Gloria terminal. A happy ending for both mahb and ak, and opportunity to spend some $$$ on promotion and celebration. Edited June 22, 2016 by KK Lee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BC Tam 2 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 (edited) Instead of MAHB understanding "low-cost business", why not Tan Sri TF and his ilk try discover/understand 'why' MAHB need to do as it does ?! Not that I'm saying one is right, the other wrong (that would drain all the juiciness away) Theoretically, if you have a business leader worth his/her salt, it's either 1) no cost is ever low enough - better still you pay me for serving me 2) you like, you pay; you don't like, still pay Edited June 22, 2016 by BC Tam Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jani 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 I think what they planned to do.. Rename the terminal to lcct2, then the whole world bought into the new name. Then AK will demand "now you call it lcct, take away the aerobridges, lower the fees.", now that the whole world is calling it LCCT2. Bingo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KK Lee 5 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 Bingo If ak takes over klia2/lcct2/t2, it will charge extra for use of walkalator, buggy transfer, security fast lane, priority baggage delivery, check in, No take away from eatery, etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flee 5 Report post Posted June 22, 2016 New airport but HQ still in a rut http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/06/22/new-airport-but-hq-still-in-a-rut/ Cool it, says Liow http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/06/22/cool-it-says-liow/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
leon t 0 Report post Posted June 23, 2016 There is certaintly no need to rename KLIA2 to avoid any confusion to esp international travelers and AK spending all these unnecessary money and effort in so doing which can go towards to offsetting its air fares. The primary reason I can see why Air Asia is doing that is to try his hardest to get back some concessions or discounts as do believe they still owe MAB some millions in past fees etc that it had not paid due to their disagreements with MAB. But on fares, yes Air Asia is not as cheap as one would think as have gotten twice MAS airfare to Melbourne return which were cheaper than Air Asia X this year!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JuliusWong 0 Report post Posted June 27, 2016 AirAsia has officially starts to call klia2 as LCCT. All online booking are now showing departing KUL station as "LCCT" and they have put up a huge post on promoting "LCCT". https://www.facebook.com/AirAsia/?ref=notif¬if_t=notify_me_page¬if_id=1466838032315939 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kee Hooi Yen 0 Report post Posted June 27, 2016 Perhaps AK can call Complex Bunga Raya as LCCT3 too as it has no aerobridge ... <_> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mushrif A 3 Report post Posted June 27, 2016 Great stuff! Now that the renaming has been done, all airfares on AK are now 40% cheaper. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mushrif A 3 Report post Posted June 27, 2016 AK should try to take its head out the sand..."some" actually means "most" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jani 0 Report post Posted June 27, 2016 (edited) Clearly AK just having a laugh. Looks like to be done in jest. Bad joke, though. Edited June 27, 2016 by jani Share this post Link to post Share on other sites