flee 5 Report post Posted October 17, 2011 SEPANG, Oct 17 (Bernama) -- Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said it was timely for the government to formally put in place a National Aviation Policy, given the country's landscape and the maturity of many segments in the sector. The prime minister said it was essential that a comprehensive policy defining all the key aspects of aviation, its direction, objectives and long- term strategies be laid out for the clarity of all Malaysia's aviation stakeholders as the country moved forward in a most uncertain and volatile time for this sector. "Towards that end, the government through the Transport Ministry intends to formulate such a policy as soon as possible. I believe the ministry has initiated several consultations and discussions with various parties concerned and a policy framework will take shape in the very near future," he said. Najib was speaking at the launching of 100 Years of Aviation in Malaysia at Malaysia Airlines (MAS) A380, Hangar 6, KL International Airport, here, Monday night. Also present was Transport Minister Datuk Seri Kong Cho Ha. Najib said he was certain that a comprehensive National Aviation Policy would give the country an important boost "as we take the next step forward to a brighter and more defined future for Malaysian aviation. "I look forward to unveiling this policy after all inputs, views and concerns from all stakeholders have been considered and evaluated." The prime minister said in Malaysia, the government was cognisant of the fact that aviation infrastructure was critical to national development and global integration. He said Malaysia had reaped the benefits from air links that had expanded the country's export markets globally and generated a boom in the tourism industry. "Last year, overall passenger traffic across all our airports grew 12 per cent to over 57 million passengers. KLIA alone recorded over 34 million passenger movements, up 14.8 per cent from the previous year, with 60 carriers now operating from this world-class facility. "The fact is, the national aviation sector has a high multiplier effect of 12.5 times to the overall Malaysian economy in terms of tourism, infrastructure and logistics development," he added. At the event, Najib also handed out licences to 47 students taking up aircraft maintenance engineering. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KK Lee 5 Report post Posted October 17, 2011 (edited) National policy means protectionism. Could not recall a single national policy implemented by the gomen that lead the particular industry excels internationally. In this ever changing and competitive market, national policy/protectionism is the last thing any industry need especially formulated by half past six politicians with vested interest. Edited October 17, 2011 by KK Lee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N Azman 0 Report post Posted October 17, 2011 Id rather not be so negative. NAP is supposed to cover the entire aviation sector value chain. manufacturing tiers 1-3, MRO, FDI through OEM involvement, asset and spares management, etc and it is supposed to make it easier to introduce such tech and business in this country. for airlines, think incentives for direct operations into domestic points from overseas. think green initiatives that can be translated to tax breaks, think incentives for foreign AOC applicants, think easier access to grants, think tax holidays, think tax free zones, think investment criterion that would encourage (in fact enforce) foreign companies to invest and develop local tech and talent, rather than just treating us like a 3rd world country manufacturing plant with cheap labor. think incentives for moving logistics via KUL/PEN hub. think talent development, jobs for our boys and girls, Lots of benefits to a properly build NAP. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 0 Report post Posted October 17, 2011 To quote Milton Friedman, "Corruption is government intrusion into market efficiencies in the form of regulations." Could this plan to formulate said policy be a response to or perhaps part of the MH-AK deal? One shall see I think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheng Long 0 Report post Posted October 17, 2011 A fair and transparent policy is the way to go.. Otherwise, it's like you will get your way depending on who you know.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alberttky 0 Report post Posted October 17, 2011 It took the bloody country 100 years to come up with a policy?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raymund Yeoh 1 Report post Posted October 17, 2011 "I look forward to unveiling this policy after all inputs, views and concerns from all stakeholders have been considered and evaluated." I wonder who he is refering too here......from what I see not much stakeholders to gather inputs as long as they get what they want..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 0 Report post Posted October 17, 2011 It took the bloody country 100 years to come up with a policy?? To be fair aviation didn't start in Malaysia until the 1930's, so might wanna tone down your grouse a bit? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BC Tam 2 Report post Posted October 17, 2011 To be fair aviation didn't start in Malaysia until the 1930's ..... The occasion where intention was made known was to clelebrate Malaysia 100 Years of Aviation Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alberttky 0 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 The occasion where intention was made known was to clelebrate Malaysia 100 Years of Aviation Thanks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
affendi osman 0 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 It took the bloody country 100 years to come up with a policy?? We are only 54 years young. How do you count it as 100 years? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 0 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 The occasion where intention was made known was to clelebrate Malaysia 100 Years of Aviation My bad. *knocks head* Hello? somebody in there? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike P 0 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 Stop the protect and favour policy! Give more flights freedom! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mohd Suhaimi Fariz 2 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 The occasion where intention was made known was to clelebrate Malaysia 100 Years of Aviation 100 years it may be, but it was the Brits who flew around back then. Technically, the Malaysian aviation sector, as run by Malaysians is not 100 obviously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raymund Yeoh 1 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 Well...let's revisit this thread 6 months from now and see what policy or news updates we have on this so-called NAP..........i can say nothing much of an update........just empty talk Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alberttky 0 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 We are only 54 years young. How do you count it as 100 years? How did the organizer of this event count it as 100 years? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flee 5 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 Well the aviation industry is a high risk, capital and labour intensive industry. In order for the industry to thrive, players need to have a stable framework to operate on. Currently "policy" is very much implemented on an ad hoc basis, as and when the need arises. If the Najib govt. can come up with a policy that is professionally drafted policy that will enable the industry to thrive, then it will be a good thing. If it will be more of the same type of policies like those of the National Auto Policy, the Malaysian aviation industry will be doomed! Can we trust the govt. to do the right thing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raymund Yeoh 1 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 How did the organizer of this event count it as 100 years? well in M'sia anythin is possible.....anyway, i googled and got this as this is what the GOM take to declare 100 years of aviation....shouldn't the event be held at Alor Star since it was where it started commercially.... 1) Chronology of events>1898: A balloonist jumps off the top of a government building in Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, Kuala Lumpur, and crashes at the edge of the Selangor Padang Club. > 1911: G.P. Fuller makes the first recorded flight in Malaya and lands his Antoinette Monoplane at the race course in Jalan Ampang, Kuala Lumpur. > 1924: The first civil aircraft in Malaya, a Fokker FVII of KLM, lands on a bumpy grass strip in Alor Setar, Kedah. > 1928: Alor Setar, Kedah, becomes the hub of aviation activities in Malaya as KLM carries out fortnightly services. > 1929: Aviation comes to Kuala Lumpur with the inaugural meeting of the Malayan Aeroplane Club held in the Malay States Volunteer Reserve Mess. > 1930: Commercial aviation begins in Malaya with the services of Imperial Airways and its “flying boat” operations in Penang. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KK Lee 5 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 Id rather not be so negative. NAP is supposed to cover the entire aviation sector value chain. manufacturing tiers 1-3, MRO, FDI through OEM involvement, asset and spares management, etc and it is supposed to make it easier to introduce such tech and business in this country. for airlines, think incentives for direct operations into domestic points from overseas. think green initiatives that can be translated to tax breaks, think incentives for foreign AOC applicants, think easier access to grants, think tax holidays, think tax free zones, think investment criterion that would encourage (in fact enforce) foreign companies to invest and develop local tech and talent, rather than just treating us like a 3rd world country manufacturing plant with cheap labor. think incentives for moving logistics via KUL/PEN hub. think talent development, jobs for our boys and girls, Lots of benefits to a properly build NAP. Asian Composites Manufacturing Sdn Bhd, Composites Technology Research Malaysia Sdn Bhd, etc are already located in free trade zone, granted tax free holiday, etc, and MH is exempted from import duty and tax. Given national policy implemented by the gomen for car, steel, rice, etc; tax incentives and grants may be available to the privileges few but also mean approval permits (AP) likely be needed for the whole supply chain. By forcing out existing suppliers and restricting supply, rent seekers will force consumers to pay higher price in the long run. Believe Berjaya/Lion Air will be the test case and indicator for this national policy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Arzman 0 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 Believe Berjaya/Lion Air will be the test case and indicator for this national policy. We need another alternative and wish Lion/Berjaya the best Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tamizi Hj Tamby 1 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 We need another alternative and wish Lion/Berjaya the best Wishing them all the best! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flee 5 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 We need another alternative and wish Lion/Berjaya the best While we need competition, our market is small. So more competition might not mean lower fares or better service, if the airline operator is a small company with little resources. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KK Lee 5 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 (edited) While we need competition, our market is small. So more competition might not mean lower fares or better service, if the airline operator is a small company with little resources. The same argument why Malaysians are paying very expensive price for cars Even if Berjaya/Lion Air is permitted to ply limited domestic routes (e.g. 5m ppa) will enough to force down both AK/MH airfare Edited October 18, 2011 by KK Lee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alberttky 0 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 The same argument why Malaysians are paying very expensive price for cars Even if Berjaya/Lion Air is permitted to ply limited domestic routes (e.g. 5m ppa) will enough to force down both AK/MH airfare Cars are different. Garmen simply impose ridiculous tax rates to make money for imported cars. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KK Lee 5 Report post Posted October 18, 2011 Cars are different. Garmen simply impose ridiculous tax rates to make money for imported cars. Without competition, there is nothing to stop AK/MH to charge expensive domestic fare like pre-AK days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
