Newitt

And?

The two survivors were not injured, they walked off unscathed.

What Jahur sair, bunch of bla bla bla's.

Looking at the picture it seems it's not your typical ground vehicle bumping and denting an aircraft. The left wing appears to have sliced right through the roof pillars of the vehicle at a high speed. If tower cleared the a/c to land while the vehicle was still on the runway then this is a serious safety oversight. Somebody up in the tower could have been sleeping on the job unaware of the ground vehicle. Either that or the vehicle strayed onto the runway, which is also a serious safety oversight. If anyone can dig up past NOTAM of the airfield to see if there's any mention of runway closure/repair work it would shed some light on how this may have happened.

On the revenue side, MAB is still plagued by relatively poor booking class mix year after year, the sheer size of the lower classes bring the average down. They are still selling hard and not selling smart. It's a brute force approach on the market instead of a surgical one. Low penetration rate of internet bookings also compounds the problem with high cost of sales. Also non-fuel costs are not as low as they wished it to be.

You're missing the point. You're speaking as if all the four seats are taken on most flights. You'd be surprised how much revenue F does NOT bring if you're privy to the numbers... Truth is, so-called VVIPs aren't very important in the bigger scale of airline revenue generation. If they flock to OALs' so be it. Sooner or later F cabin will be non-existent anyway ;)

In its current state do you think MAB really want (or need) to increase budget on revamping cabin and IFE? There's very limited competition ex-Subang. If one carrier raises fares yet impact on passenger volume is minimal, it won't take long for the other to follow suit and increase fares too. Who wouldn't want a boost in revenue from higher yields, especially when your neighbour is enjoying it and breaking even with an easier to achieve load factor. Looks like the CEO is in a loss-mitigating mode. Wonder if he's got a clue what direction to take. There is a need to fix the base business, and strings of promos isn't a healthy way to do it like what we've seen this year. Perhaps Khazanah should look East at JAL, or just let go of MAB and let it operate like a business. The A350 really shouldn't have that coffin-style space-wasting First class and it is one of the wasted opportunity for more revenue.

You can see in the pictures burn marks from pitot heat on the pitot tube covers. Wasp problems aside how did the covers go missed during the walkaround?

Khalil, Suzanne and Chris need to have their own thread, who knows when they put their heads together they could come up with some mind blowing strategies to fix everything that's wrong in the world of commercial aviation (and perhaps to find solutions to their never ending feud) just so that not every thread degenerates into their long-standing petty argument.

1Malaysia is no longer relevant to MH branding now.

No need, they're here already...

Actually once 131 lands in SUB after circling until midday pax are to make their own onward arrangements to AKL for them to catch the 130 back to KUL.

The Aerotrain is not really a train in its true sense. It's got rubber wheels and the track guides its direction. The fact that there's less moving parts i.e no rails shows MAHB's attitude to maintenance of the trains. Haven't they got a spare train?

The p1ss-taking needs to stop

Glad the cockpit crew did not ask the passengers to pray...

Don't you think it is better for everyone that one is not overly sensitive and does not entertain and react to petty remarks on an Internet forum? Doing so is adding fuel to fire

There's technically nothing wrong with the promo video, even from a language standpoint. Ambiance is as correct as ambience as far as language is concerned. Heck even the spellcheck on this forum reply box is putting a red underline under the word ambience, but none under ambiance. Sure ambience is more widely used but ambiance is still correct, it doesn't even sound odd. This harks back to the AirAsia's Bank Rakyat livery where people disputed the tagline on the plane... 'Your Choice Bank' vs 'Your Bank of Choice'. If some of the people here had known better then the wonky MH Facebook replies wouldn't have showed up here, causing the thread to start on its downward spiral to what it is right now. Let's see how far it's going to devolve. By the way could everyone lay off on singling out other users. It only aggravates things. Cheers all.

Rephrase, what difference to the incident and the circumstances around the incident would it have made if MH122 that had to be diverted to ASP was operating at full capacity?

What difference would it have made if it was operating at full capacity? More sensational? Please enlighten.

Ambiance/ambience is French in origin. Quit nitpicking on things that are right.

Indeed. Even better if the 350 had the nose of the 787, then we've got a winner in the aesthetics department

Not only you have a legal background but you are a lawyer too? The top brass of MH must be sh*tting their pants right now... Don't mind me I am a layman and and my thinking differs from that of a donkey... and I'm totally proud of it!

Please, believe a lot of people don't quite appreciate this patronising and somewhat sexist remark. If you have a beef with another person appreciate if you could make use of the private messaging feature. Thanks.

Unless you are unfamiliar with FSCs I don't see any other reason you may think you need to pay for baggage allowance. When one reaches the Choose Services page it's quite clear to see these services are extras in addition to what's already in your booking. Also when selecting your flight if you click on the fare product it shows your allocated baggage allowance, mile accrual what have you.

That so? I can see 26th is still 359? So is 30th for the inbound.