Jump to content
MalaysianWings - Malaysia's Premier Aviation Portal

Mike P

Platinum Member
  • Content Count

    1,609
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mike P


  1. 3 hours ago, BC Tam said:

    Malaysia Airlines admits snacks 'too light' during horror flight ordeal

    from: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12299336

    If anyone of us was on that flight and could be bothered to file a trip report ...... 😁

     

     

    Gosh! This is horrible. I  flew to PVG with family last month but their connecting flight to KUL was delayed and causing them have to wait for 2nd flight which was 10 hours + apart. They were given stay and lunch buffet at Marriot Hotel which I thought it was reasonable.


  2. 22 minutes ago, JuliusWong said:

    Unless all three airlines in Malaysia buy shitload of Boeing aircarft as sweetener and Dr. M visits USA more often in next two years to urge Donald Trump for a favour. Knowing how Dr. M works, nah, till hell freezes over. Vietnam and the Philippines were in Cat II for a long period before FAA finally approved them. Right after high level officals including their President numerous visit and Vietjet signed 200 MAX order and Vietnam Airlines bought shitload B787s. The Phillipines bought B77W.

    Trump is under impeachment hearing! bro! 


  3. Quite a sensational claim by FAA after the fiasco of Boeing 737 Max. So CAAM has to bear the full responsibility on this then? How would MH and AK/D7 and OD play the roles here to help to improve the category?

    This would be another question mark on the potential buyer of MH. To relate this matter to MH 370 and MH 17 is also quite absurd, with MH 370 is still no where to be found and unclear of the aircraft's whereabout and MH 17 was totally out of its control while it was flying on an approved route, wasn't SQ and another Indian carrier was just behind MH 17? Both incidents just put MH on a real bad year of luck in 2014, it's ironic that US satellite could tell China was deploying tanks in Shenzhen to prepare for HK's situation but could not detect MH 370...hmmmm...  


  4. What I meant was D7's days of flying to Europe was a long time ago. These days, the competitive situation is even greater. That is why they keep hesitating about returning to Europe - they may never be able to do so without losing money! Condor might also be feeling this lack of yields.

     

    Condor is a hybrid, they are not like D7 that provides totally no frills services.


  5. I survived a D7 A343 return flight to ORY but I managed to grab their launch fare. The product was the same as what we get on their Asian routes but the flight was twice as long. If I had to pay their normal fares, I doubt that I will be keen since the ME3 fares are only about 20% more. And sometimes, we even get fares that are very close to what D7 is charging.

     

    There is a reason why they are not able to sustain their ORY and LGW services...

     

    20% more? you sure? QR offering to MUC from KUL at RM 2k return.


  6.  

    2 Airlines are not a monopol ;-)

     

    Malaysia have 32 million people and 3 more or less big airlines.

    Germany have 83 million people and it was not possible to establish Air Berlin as second big player beside Lufthansa.

     

    Competion is great yes - and you pay for it with your taxes...around RM32 from every malay for MAS in 2018!

     

    What use is competition for you if the airlines do not make any profits? That is the basic requirement for a substantial business model or not?

     

    Wouldn't really use Air Berlin or Germany as a country to compare. Do note that Germany is part of EU and they have free movement along the EU and given that they also have very good transportation in terms of land, sea and air so options are all there.


  7. SIN, DXB and HKG are significant markets in their own right. They might be major transit hubs but the majority of passengers are actually O&D. Changi and SQ, which are looked upon with envy and fascination by many here, would not have thrived if it weren't for Singapore's position as a major financial hub. Connecting traffic might sound lucrative but in reality it only supplements O&D traffic, where the real money is.

     

    The idea that you can just build a huge airport in an insignificant city and grow a world-class airline that connects the world is nothing more than a fantasy. Unless, of course, you're DOH. But then again, QR's mission isn't to make money, to put it very mildly. They have the backing of the Qatari government and its very deep pockets to sustain such a business model. Does Sarawak have that luxury?

     

    Only if Sarawak has more oil royalty.

×
×
  • Create New...