Jump to content
MalaysianWings - Malaysia's Premier Aviation Portal

Nabiel Haniff

Gold Member
  • Content Count

    609
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nabiel Haniff


  1. Saw in their FB page that they are now recruting CABIN CREW for female and male. At the bottom

    Of the advertisment, they put that hijab female are encourage to apply.

     

    I believe their uniform will be more to islamic concept. Female with hijab and maybe first airlines in Malaysia with Hijab stewardess.


  2. Things are not looking well for flynas. KUL is temporarily suspended. http://airlineroute.net/2014/07/30/xy-kul-sep14/

     

    Flynas cancelled Manchester a few days ago.

     

    Hopefully this is not a sign of going bust.

    My aunty went to JED by Flynas and during the outbound flight from KUL, the pax load was only 30% . Their JED-KUL flight also delayed for 8 hours and only provided by sandwhich n mineral water. I guess they retimed the flight just because of light load to kul and vice versa


  3. I tend to favour a brand new livery and a change of colours. Perhaps the yellow and black of Malayan Airways can be pressed back into service. Airline can perhaps be rebranded as Royal Malaysian Airways?

    Refurbish an airline not only depends on the name, indeed, changing the name will only put more cost on repainting, new uniform n etc. but anyway, i attracted toRoyal Malaysian Airways(RMA)


  4. My first thought before reading the BBC link is oh no it can't be the D7 A340 that is currently being wet leased to them.

     

    Would appreciate if anyone can give some details of the D7 wet lease agreement with Air Algerie - how many aircraft, how many Malaysian crews based in Algiers etc.

    Friend of mine one the crew operated for AirAlgerie as D7 crew. They using A330 instead of A340. Luckily they all safe. As per him, they just meet the ill-fated crew at hotel's lobby before they leave for AH5507. They said aircraft was leased by swift air for Air Algerie. Pray and thoughts for them.

     

    Regarding to your question, D7 leased one of their A330 wih 2 or 4 set of crew if not mistaken.


  5. The terminal looks good on the outside. Inside, a wholw different story. For me its a design failure. A rushed job. Missed opportunity to make it better. Mumbai terminal two is like 100% better. Sure the argument about low cost vs full terminal gonna rise but its a shame where we can do better, we chose not to. The terminal is going to stay for at least 20-30 years. Too bad we will be paying huge electricity bills due to design flaws in KLIA2.

     

    MTB is way better in terms of natural lighting and spaciousness feel.

    Exactly, totally agreed with you. From outside it looked great, but when stepped inside, its very bad. The target for MAHB is green airport environment, but in klia2, its totally different. Narrow walkway, bad lighting, not user friendly for elderly and disable and poor in signage and less variety of foods when u are inside the departure hall


  6. But then the waiting hall is now an open space right? with seats outside of the holding area?

     

    Or am i wrong? Haven't had the chance to try airside KLIA2 as yet

    Certain gates only got waiting hall outside. As per my experiences in both gate K and L, only few seats available outside and not enough seat inside the hall. MAHB should consider other way to improve it. They spend more, but with bad result. If you coming from gate L13, u can see there is a lot of unused space when u walking towards the aerobridge. No seats at all.


  7. I have Checked randomly on Raya flight for KUL/SZB - KBR , all fares quite expesive and frequencies very good,

    9 flights by AirAsia, 9 flights by MalindoAir and 12 flights by Firefly, none from Malaysia Airlines.

     

    Why no departure from KUL for MH? All transferred to FY only?

    Feel free to share flight frequencies for any Malaysia hotspot destinations during this festive .


  8.  

    It was supposed to be VietJet Airasia. However, the Vietnamese govt. decided to protect their aviation industry and did not approve the joint venture. So it was dissolved.

     

    But VietJet learnt a thing or two from Airasia during the period when the JV was in place.

    Ic, thats why their aircraft livery look alike AK.

    Sad story for AK bcoz can't expand their wings to Vietnam.

×
×
  • Create New...